ACLS and Amiodarone | ACLS-Algorithms.com

Comments

  1. Miguel Delgado says

    My Question I guess is a simple one….
    If Pt. happen to received an Amio drip ( 150mg / 10 to 15 m. ) and pt received the full dose. Now pt. evolved to cardiac arrest , 300 mg. is given and then 150 mg second dose while arrest is been worked. Due to change in Pt. Does we give the full 450 mg. while the arrest take place, or do we count the 150 that was drip.

    • ACLS says

      In the emergency you can give the amiodarone per the cardiac arrest algorithm. Important to consider that the maximum dose in the 24 hour period is 2.2 g.
      You can give the 300 mg dose and then the 150 mg dose while the arrest is taking place.

      Kind regards,
      Jeff

  2. Dave says

    Thank you for all the information above. How do you recommend delivering the Amio over 10 minutes? The math on the drip rate is “high” to say the least, so would it just be wide open?
    Thank you

    • ACLS says

      150 mg of amiodarone may be diluted in
      150 mg over the FIRST 10 minutes (15 mg/min).
      Add 3 mL of Cordarone I.V. (150 mg) to 100 mL D5W (concentration = 1.5 mg/mL). Infuse 100 mL over 10 minutes

      Kind regards,
      Jeff

  3. Kylie Wagstaff says

    I am a practice nurse at an Aboriginal Health Service in Australia and I have spent hours today searching for some evidence about how to give Amiodarone in an arrest situation. I know the dose, I know when, I just didn’t know whether it had to be diluted. I know that it can only go int 5%Dext so I thought it had to be diluted. Worked out that I can give it as a push and one of the comments here answered the next question about given it with a n/saline IV running and can I use a n/saline flush!! All answered!! Just wanted to add some information to our emerg trolley because we dont really have any ALS specialists and I am sure not one. So just want to say a big thankyou!!

  4. Marilyn says

    Hi Jeff!
    Im sure you’ve seen all the studies out there that showed patients that went into sudden witnessed cardiac arrest with the presenting rhythm being asystole, where they immediately applied ultrasound and in many cases what showed as asystole on the monitors, actually was proven by ultrasound to be fine or very fine VF for a short period of time before turning into asystole since asystole has such a near zero survival rate. So my question is, since the AHA is still strongly against defibrillating asystole due to the risk of myocardial damage and not worth losing the time from having to stop ; is it or is it not reasonable, in a sudden witnessed cardiac arrest with a presenting rhythm on the monitor, to immediately begin the asystole algorithm, and after a couple cycles of immediate aggressive CPR and epi administration, to then give every possible attempt to save the patient by (after zero response to a couple cycles of aggressive CPR and epi every 3-4 mins) to try the ACLS dose of the only ACLS approved antiarrythmic, amiodarone, since we did not have an ultrasound at our disposal, just in case this witnessed, asystolic presenting (verified on other leads and gain up) arrest was, as these peer reviewed studies are showing, another case of fine or very fine vf unable to be picked up by the sensitivity of the trans thoracic monitor- in the hopes of it (worst case scenario) at least unmasking the fine vf so we can justifiably switch to the pulseless VF algorithm including shocking, or best case scenario, do what its purpose in the VF algorithm is and either unmask a return of SR (or at least unmask the very potential fine VF as ANY rhythm that would then allow us to switch to that appropriate algorithm. Our logic was (1) as explained above and (2) since it is well known and documented that preceding amiodarone with full doses of epi (and rounds of CPR) cancel out that amiodarone would exert cardiac depressive effects, is that not a reasonable, safe, and appropriate action to give every possible attempt at saving that patients life- again after atropine was given initially as well as a couple immediate doses of epilepsy every 3-4 mins and nonstop aggressive CPR- and knowing that the period of very fine vf masked as asystole on the monitor is short lived before degrading to true asystole; and all studies show the near zero rates of survival from an asystole presenting sudden witnessed arrest? Our logic being the limits of the asystole algorithm (aggressive CPR and epi) had no effect and knowing the current studies of patients presenting, especially witnessed, with asystole yet were proven by ultrasound to be in fine vf masked as asystole on our transthoracic external monitors, that as even the AHA says about its own algorithms, they are only guidelines and providers are not just allowed but encouraged to amended an algorithm to specific situations that have possibility of helping to save the patient. And therefore, with a nonresponse to an initial dose of atropine, and epi given every 3-4 mins without ever interrupting aggressive CPR, then it was a safe and appropriate attempt to address the proven possibility of fine vf masked as asystole with the ACLS dose of amiodarone to give every possibility of life by seeing ANY conversion to, or at least unmasking of, ANY rhythm besides asystole, knowing the preceding multiple doses of epi would not “risk any amiodarone depression of the asystolic or possibly fine vf heart”, and thereby making it a safe and appropriate intervention to give every possible shot at saving an witnessed, asystolic (on monitor) sudden cardiac arrest? Especially seeing them not respond to just episode and aggressive CPR, and further knowing the well established chances of asystolic cardiac arrest has a near zero survival rate just following the asystole algorithm strictly, without trying to address the possibility of a short initial period of fine vf unable to be picked up by limited sensitivity of our trans thoracic defib and anesthesia machine monitors?

    • ACLS says

      Hi Marilyn,

      Thank you for the comment. I appreciate thoughtful comments like yours. You are absolutely justified in making every attempt to save the patient and the American heart Association as you say encourages providers to deviate from algorithm if the situation warrants deviation. Your scenario would be a candidate for deviation from the specific ACLS algorithm. You can’t make a dead heart more dead with amiodarone or even a defibrillation. I say go for it.

      Kind regards,
      Jeff

    • Ramin says

      Great article!

      Question 1): Why is atropine not recommended during CPR?
      Question 2): Why wait for third shock before administrating Amiodarone? My gut feeling tells me it should be more reasonable to give Amiodarone directly after first failed shock.

      With kind regards,

      Ramin

    • ACLS says

      Yes amiodarone can be given IV push through a running IV. Just ensure that the amiodarone is given at the closest injection port to the patient in order to reduce the amount of dwelltime of the medication in the IV tubing.

      These medications are being pushed as fast as you can push the plunger. They are also being followed with high flow normal saline or 20 mL of normal saline. Thus, the risk of medication precipitation is extremely low.

      Kind regards,
      Jeff

  5. Ty says

    Why is Amiodarone not given for PEA? Are there negative outcomes for giving Amiodarone in PEA? Is it contraindicated, or does it just not work in PEA so there is no point in giving it? Cant find any research that answers this question.

    • ACLS says

      Amiodarone is used for its anti-arrhythmic properties. It helps to stabilize irritability in the heart and reduce risk of ventricular fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. It’s mechanism of action is not fully understood.

      Amiodarone would have no effect for the treatment of asystole or pulseless electrical activity and so there is no use giving it.

      Kind regards,
      Jeff

    • ACLS says

      The first dose of amiodarone is given after the third shock during CPR. The second dose of amiodarone is given during CPR anytime after the fourth shock. There’s no timeframe except to make sure that the first dose had enough time for permeation into the central circulation. Kind regards, Jeff

  6. Jeremy says

    Amiodarone is a very complex drug, with serious long term effects on the body. And it stays in your system for much longer than most would guess. Why would one not choose lidocaine as their first choice anti-arrythmic every time?

    • ACLS says

      Both lidocaine and amiodarone are considered acceptable antiarrhythmic medications that can be given. AHA has stated that these two medications are equivalent as antiarrhythmics in cardiac arrest. Kind regards, Jeff

  7. Kevin Chikrista says

    There is only the first and second dose for Amiodarone in Cardiac Arrest Guideline. Why is that so? Harmful to give the third dose?

    • ACLS says

      It’s not that a third dose would be harmful. These protocols have been developed with regard to research that has been performed and the protocols that showed improved survival to hospital discharge or improved ROSC are implemented. No added benefit was shown for further bolus doses. That would not exclude a third bolus and this would be up to the discretion of the provider. The only thing that they would have to be careful about is not to exceed the 2.2 g per day max cumulative dose.

      Kind regards,
      Jeff

  8. Violet says

    Other than D5W, can sterile water for injection/distilled water be used for dilution for IV bolus of amiodarone? Or only D5W can be used for dilution even for IV bolus (to be given for 10 mins) ? Thank you

    • ACLS says

      D5W is the only fluid that should be used to reconstitute and dilute amiodarone. This is because other fluids may cause precipitation of solid particles within the liquid.

      Kind regards,
      Jeff

      • Olivia Hodgins says

        I think the person above meant that 300 mg of Amiodarone was given for the 1st and 2nd dose.

        However, my question is do they still use IV bottles for the amiodarone drip considering the fact that the amiodarone is absorbed into the plastic and is a fairly consistent dose after that. O

      • ACLS says

        They now have types of plastic that prevent the amiodarone from being absorbed and this has led to new packaging for amiodarone and there are now companies that produce amiodarone that comes in individual liquid filled plastic IV bags.

        Kind regards,
        Jeff

    • ACLS says

      Epinephrine and amiodarone are both used in the left branch of the cardiac arrest algorithm for the treatment of vfib and pulse less VT. Indications for use is cardiac arrest and both are required for in hospital cardiac arrest. The first dose of epinephrine should be given after the 2nd shock and the first dose of amiodarone should be given after the 3rd shock.

      Kind regards,
      Jeff

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I accept the Privacy Policy