ACLS Megacode Scenario 1 | ACLS-Algorithms.com

Comments

  1. topazkimc says

    Simulator 1. question #5. After Defibrillation, are we doing CPR For the Vtach in question #4 or are we doing CPR For the SVT ?

    (The monitor/ECG shows narrow complex SVT with a HR of 180.)

    • Jeff with admin. says

      After question #1 in the megacode scenarios, only look at the data given in the question. Everything above the gray line is from the beginning of the scenario.
      Kind regards,
      Jeff

  2. karen golik says

    I worked the ER & had a woman come in routinely in SVT> I would hook her to the monitor, while starting her IV ask her to cough, then give her the adenosine.

  3. wmrrrt says

    It is not a well know fact in my community that some manufactures have manipulated the Biphasic defibrillator to deliver up to 360 joules. News to me. I suppose I’m behind the curve.

    • Jeff with admin. says

      In the question it states, “What is the most important intervention in the post-cardiac arrest phase?”
      The answer is therapeutic hypothermia because therapeutic hypothermia is the only intervention demonstrated to improve neurologic recovery after cardiac arrest in the unresponsive patient. This is why it is considered the most important intervention.

      Kind regards,
      Jeff

      • Medic908 says

        The fact that pt has been moved from ER to ICU the pts patent airway minus Capnogrophy should still be of importance prior to hypothermia.The case of tube displacement would make hypothermia useless? Questions that are vauge as in “phase” are prompting students to skip steps.
        Thank You,
        Michael

      • Jeff with admin. says

        Thank you for the feedback. Key statements in the question should clue students into what the question is addressing. The statement, “does not respond to verbal commands” and “Since the patient is not responsive” specifically address the decision point for therapeutic hypothermia in the post-cardiac algorithm. Nothing in the question indicates that the tube has been displaced or is suspected to be displaced.

        Kind regards,
        Jeff

  4. Cindy B says

    This is great for reviewing. I need repetition and this is another wonderful tool. Although, not bragging, but pleasantly surprised that I did very well on this first simulator quiz; 12/12 but the results showed 11 out of 12? Regardless, very pleased with the first scenario. On to the rest!

  5. juank mena says

    la pregunta siete arroja como resultado una opcion erronea ya que al inicio del simulador se nos dijo que era bifasico y por consiguiente el maximo de julios es de 200

    • Jeff with admin. says

      On this site all scenarios, assume that the biphasic defibrillator shock setting can be from 50-360 Joules.
      The shock selection on many biphasic defibrillators can vary.
      Kind regards,
      Jeff

      • Jonathan Richard says

        I thought the biphasic defibrillator shock setting went only up to 200?
        Monophasic allows it to go up to 360.

      • Jeff with admin. says

        It depends upon the manufacturer. Some manufactures have settings that range from 50-200J and some have settings which range from 50-360 J. For consistency on this website, I use the setting of 50-360 J biphasic.

        Kind regards,
        Jeff

  6. Michael says

    Question 7 asked about the settings 200 or 300. I chose 200 because that is as high as the new models go. The correct answer was 300. Is there new biphasics that go to 300?

    • Jeff with admin. says

      Different models will have different maximums. I have seen biphasic defibrillators that use 360 J as the maximum dose. The main point to remember is always use increasing sequential doses until you reach the maximum dose. Really, you can use 50 J increases each time as well. The 120-200-300-360 is just a common practice and has proven to be effective for termination of VF/Pulseless VT.

      Kind regards,
      Jeff

      • Paul says

        I chose 200 because i was misled by ” sexond and subsequent doses should be equivalent. And higher doses may be considered”. This is slightly confusing

      • Jeff with admin. says

        I’m not sure why AHA says “equivalent or higher.” If a shock does not produce conversion, you should increase the dose in a step wise fashion if it is possible to increase the dose.
        Actually, leaving the shock dose at the same level could be detrimental because, there is some evidence that suggests that the heart becomes more resistant to subsequent shocks unless the dosing is increased.

        Kind regards,
        Jeff

  7. roodiemcain6@yahoo.com says

    Kudos Jeff! Your site is informative, direct & to the point, & very affordable. I will definitely spread the word.

    Thanks,

    Ruthie RN, BSN

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I accept the Privacy Policy