Time limit: 0
Quiz Summary
0 of 12 Questions completed
Questions:
Information
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
Results
Quiz complete. Results are being recorded.
Results
0 of 12 Questions answered correctly
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
-
Question 1 of 12
1. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 2 of 12
2. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 3 of 12
3. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 4 of 12
4. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 5 of 12
5. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 6 of 12
6. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 7 of 12
7. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 8 of 12
8. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 9 of 12
9. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 10 of 12
10. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 11 of 12
11. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 12 of 12
12. Question
CorrectIncorrect
liz says
I believe #12 is worded in correctly. We do NOT want to make the patient colder. The patient needs to be warmed up with monitors on.
Jeff with admin. says
Therapeutic hypothermia is desired in this situation. Cooling the patient per therapeutic hypothermia protocol would be indicated. Please read this page regarding post-cardiac arrest care and hypotherima.
Kind regards,
Jeff
yvette billbe says
For question 3, shouldn’t you go to defibrillation since the patient is obviously unstable. The answer is synchronized cardioversion?
Jeff with admin. says
In Question #3, the pt. has unstable VT with a pulse. Any VT rhythm with a pulse should be treated with synchronized cardioversion unless, the rhythm will not sync with the defibrillator. In the case where a VT rhythm with not sync with the defibrillator, then you would perform unsynchronized shock.
Kind regards,
Jeff
cmwarner24 says
Maybe this is obvious, but why is the first intervention for the pulseless VT an unsynchronized shock and not CPR? (question #4) Thanks, Carolyn
Jeff with admin. says
The reason that the first intervention is unsynchronized shock is because the patient is already attached to the defibrillator and the arrest was witnessed. For witnessed cardiac arrest, the first and most important intervention is immediate defibrillation.
Kind regards,
Jeff
allen rasnick says
the TEAM could start cpr while the defibulator is charging. once charge… all clear… deliver shock and then back on the chest with high quality cpr.
Jeff with admin. says
Yes, you could perform CPR while the defibrillator is charging. You have initiated the shock process.
Susan says
Fantastic website! Prepping for a flight nurse interview and this is great!
Thank you!
Mehdi Davoodi says
Question No.(5) is wrong. After defibrilation we should start CPR (chest compression) irrespective of the outcome. We look at the monitor only after two minutes of CPR.
Jeff with admin. says
The answer to the question was to continue CPR. I’m not sure what you mean in your comment about question #5.
Kind regards, Jeff
Rarias says
Is sts he is in pulseless vtach. Doesnt that mean he is now in PEA. So the algorythm change he should not had been given another shock?
Jeff with admin. says
After the patient’s rhythm changed from SVT to pulseless ventricular tachycardia, you would use the left branch of the pulseless arrest algorithm. Also pulseless ventricular tachycardia is considered its own category for treatment. It is not considered PEA.
Pulseless ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation are always treated using the left branch of the pulseless arrest algorithm.
Kind regards, Jeff
pearsonj says
Why not give an unsynchronized shock @ 200j since you already have the Lifepac unit ready. Isn’t this the first step in a witnessed arrest?
Jeff with admin. says
In question #4 with the patient deteriorated into pulseless VT, the intervention was unsynchronized shock.
Kind regards,
Jeff
Rosa M Strohbehn says
Jeff, This is my first time studying for the acls. I find this web site very interesting and I know it will help me to prepared for the ACLS test. Do you have any suggestions for first timers?.
Thanks, Rosa
Jeff with admin. says
Just make sure that you cover everything in the site. Use the check list in the download library to make sure that you cover everything thoroughly.
Relax in class. After using the site you will be thoroughly prepared.
You will do great!
Kind regards,
Jeff
NONNIE says
Why would you not go to 360 J / maximum for your third shock? In practice I usually see the doctors escalate to higher shocks especially if the patients are heavy set.
Thank YOU Nonnie
Jeff with admin. says
I try and stick directly with what AHA recommends on the practice simulations. AHA calls for elevated shocks 120-200-300-360. If you started at 200 could also go: 200-300-360.
So technically, there is nothing wrong with what you suggested. I have also seen some physicians go straight to 360 J. The AHA ACLS guidelines are just guidelines and a physician may use his/her discretion during a code situation.
The reason why it is better to start as low as possible is the heart will become less responsive to each successive shock unless the shock dose is increased at least 50 J.
Kind regards
Jeff
annie0423 says
What is the difference between synchronized cardioversion and defibrillation ? The synchronization ??
Jeff with admin. says
I created a page specifically about this. You can read it here: Synchronized vs. Unsynchronized Cardioversion
alex says
You are in the ED and the patient is stable with SVT. A 12 lead ECG should be ordered as long as patient remains stable.
Jeff with admin. says
If you look above the dashed line in the initial assessment, the ECG has already been performed. You are correct. The ECG should always be performed in ED as soon as possible.
Kind regards,
Jeff
Shirleygt46 says
I thought Vagal maneuver was not recommend anymore, and how di I know he is stable.
Jeff with admin. says
Vagal maneuvers are an effective treatment for converting SVT. It is not always successful, but it is a simple and fast method to attempt.
The assessment listed above the questions indicated that the pt. was stable at the outset of the scenario.
SKIN: Hydrated, pale, warm and dry
CVS: Strong peripheral pulses and a BP of 125/80
CNS: Fully intact
RESP: RR is 22, no resp. difficulties, lungs CTA
The monitor shows narrow complex SVT with a HR of 180.
In this situation, the best indicator of stability is the blood pressure and the strong pulses.
Kind regards,
Jeff
allen rasnick says
i tell my classes … if the patient is stable then vagal… if the patient is going down the toilet …put them in the “sync”.
Jeff with admin. says
I like it. Kind regards, Jeff
mwaliliform3 says
Great site. Always my study material to keep up with my practice.
Re-certification is Jan 17-2014. Hope this helps. Thanks Jeff
Jeff with admin. says
You will do great! Kind regards, Jeff
Ken says
I am a Firefighter and current Paramedic student. I found this on google while on shift and it was very helpful! we are currently going through cardiac in class, and I personnaly find this type of set up easier to learn than just reading. Thanks again! FF/EMT K. Schwartz
Jeff with admin. says
I’m glad the site is helpful for you. I too like interactive practice. Books and text can be a little monotonous. Kind regards, Jeff
dr uzmaajmal says
BETTER EFFORT
dstanbery says
I randomly came across this site this afternoon 12/9/13 while searching for help to do my upcoming ACLS recertification. After reading the comments from others I immediately registered. I am already smiling and I have not completed the entire review. THIS IS A GOD-BLESSED Site!
I will let you know of my results after ACLS recert due on Saturday December 14, 2013.
I will not hesitate to have all my colleagues visit this site.
Thanks in advance Jeff you are a Gift to all.
God Bless you.
Jeff with admin. says
Thank you for the feedback. I am glad that the site is helpful for you.
Goddess you too, Jeff