In this PALS Megacode scenario, use the appropriate PALS algorithms to treat the patient. There are 7 questions for this PALS megacode scenario. Assume the use of biphasic defibrillator in all scenarios.
Time limit: 0
Quiz Summary
0 of 7 Questions completed
Questions:
Information
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
Results
Quiz complete. Results are being recorded.
Results
0 of 7 Questions answered correctly
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Current
- Review
- Answered
- Correct
- Incorrect
-
Question 1 of 7
1. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 2 of 7
2. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 3 of 7
3. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 4 of 7
4. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 5 of 7
5. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 6 of 7
6. Question
CorrectIncorrect -
Question 7 of 7
7. Question
CorrectIncorrect
(2020-2025 guidelines)
Angela says
As a respiratory therapists of 18 years, I would not bag mask ventilate this bronchiolitis patient. NIV is an option via RAM canulla and Vapotherm\High flow nasal canulla.
Peter says
Generally racemic epi is the go to nebulized drug for upper airway obstruction. It’s a tough call to try nebulize anything to an infant of that age and with bronchiolitis the nebs wont help that much. I feel with that scenario it’s kinda picking the best answer that’s given. There’s other choices these days as well with high flow and NIPPV options to assist the patient before intubation. In that scenario intubation is the best answer because there’s no other choices and we all know that when an infant is done compensating it’s not long before things go really south.
Alan Mclean says
Hi Jeff: re Q3: I agree completely with the answer and this is what we would do in practice [clear secretions and provide oxygen]. The question seems to be asking specifically about how to treat a LOWER airway obstruction which tends to make the responder think of bronchodilators [even though they are not effective for 3/12 infants generally]. The answer would be easier if the question simply asked for the next step in management rather than specifying management of LRT obstruction. [Just a suggestion]… alan mclean, south australia
ACLS says
Thank you very much for the feedback. I agree completely. Kind regards, Jeff
Allen Hardy says
Hello,
According to the PALS Manual, a normal respiratory rate for an infant 3-6 months old is approximately 30 -53 BPM. (Respiratory rate improved) An O2 Sat of 90% alone does not require intubation. There was no blood gas taken, so we do not know if the patient is properly ventilating. There was also no indication that the airway needs protecting. It appears that there is very little information that leads to intubating the patient.
ACLS says
I believe this was in reference to question number 5. There were several other indicators for immediate intubation.
-infant’s moderate retractions.
-breathing remains shallow and labored
-O2 sat is 90% and should be at least 94%.
-Continued decreased air movement on auscultation.
-Heart rate is 200
-lethargy increasing
All of these signs/symptoms indicate a continued worsening respiratory failure.
Kind regards,
Jeff
Jill McLoughlin says
Jeff,
Even tho I was only able to complete 81/96 tasks, I still sailed thru pals, and best of all, I understand what it all means!
I find the AHA manuals to be very dry.
I LOVE your course.
Do you have or know of, any similar classes to learn EKG interpretation?
Thanks,
Jill
ACLS says
That’s great! Thanks so much for letting me know how things went.
If you are looking for a full 12 lead EKG interpretation course then I would recommend EKG Academy
If you’re just looking for a basic three lead rhythm interpretation then I would recommend Practical Clinical Skills website
Kind regards,
Jeff
Ashok Aralihond says
what is the clinical difference between racemic and non-racemic epinephrine nebulisation?
Jeff with admin. says
There is not much of a clinical difference between racemic Epi and Epi. The major difference is that racemic epi is a different concentration from epi. Here is an good article that covers the details. Racemic Epinephrine Article
Kind regards, Jeff
Craig Di Leo says
Hey Jeff, in my paramedic class we’re taught to use epinephrine 1:1 000 SQ in this particular scenario and do not have racemic epi in the field in so. FL that I know of. Is this concentration of epi (1:1 000) as effective in this case?
Jeff with admin. says
That is fine. Evidence shows that nebulization with 3 to 5 ml of epinephrine (1:1000) is a safe therapy and is in effective alternative to racemic epinephrine with minor side-effects, for children with acute inflammatory airway obstruction.
Kind regards,
Jeff
Cathy Langham says
No comment